Reception Table Centerpiece Ideas

Three giant spaceships will attack us in December 2012

not enough Mayan prophecy, and not enough Nibiru Anunaki and their Space Colombe, was not enough for the solar supertempesta : no, we also wanted the aliens, those bad, like in Independence Day

Well, three giant ships are en route to Earth. They are close to the orbit of Pluto and will arrive in December 2012, probably to attack us. And this time to say it is not some crazy or gullible to turn, but Craig Kasnov an astrophysicist at the SETI researcher. So at least report the site and Examiner.com Pravda.ru .



Non ci credete? Guardate l'immagine qui sopra. Cosa pensate che siano quella macchie blu, così perfettamente allineate? Come mai nessun atlante stellare le ha mai classificate?



Pensate possa essere un falso? Allora consultate il sito www.sky-map.org . Cliccate sul topolino ("BETA - Star Browser ver. 2") e nella maschera di ricerca inserite queste coordinate:

16 19 38.66 -88 42 26.3

Sono la declinazione e l'ascensione retta di una zona della costellazione meridionale dell'Ottante (Octans). Nel mezzo della finestra dovrebbe comparire la stessa immagine.



Si tratta dunque davvero di un oggetto extraterrestre in rotta di avvicinamento to our planet?
not say shit ...

Before starting to analyze the image, we try to open the page of the SETI . In the window of the news peeps an interesting title: of Inbound Internet Rumor Untrue 2012 Spaceships. Well, action will cover, you say ...

then tried to search for "Craig Kasnov" on google (search already set: here). There is an astrophysicist named. That name is only associated with the "news" in question.

Oh well, it will be transliterated evil. We try to do a search with only the last name on the SETI site: nothing. The only article where it is reported that the name is the denial that I linked above. It says quote: "Nobody has ever worked Kasnov Craig called the SETI Institute. If we try Casnovia, Kassnof, Kasnof and any other variant, the result is always the same: nothing.

this could also be a cover-up? The long hand of the CIA will certainly have forced Google to SETI and remove all references to this name and who knows in what dark padded room will have pocketed the hapless researcher. And they will have left the images on the search engines to be able to say that it is all a hoax, what the heck ...

As the paranoia conspiracy there is virtually no limit, let to something more solid.

We see in detail what that report the offending sites. Before the thundering words of Pravda.ru:

was about time that science say its word on this issue (UFOs) and it did. The SETI, an independent, non-commercial, made a sensational statement.

Three gigantic spacecraft bound for Earth. The largest is 240 km long. The other two are smaller. At the moment, the objects are beyond the orbit of Pluto.

According to researchers at the SETI, the objects would be none other than extraterrestrial spacecraft. Will be visible to optical telescopes just reach the orbit of Mars. The U.S. government reportedly was informed of the matter. The ship will reach Earth in December 2012.

The other site, Examiner.com, use less dramatic tone, but the public image of openness of this article and provides the coordinates of other objects:

1. 19 25 12 46 03 -89 (the first large object)
2. 16 19 35 -88 43 10 (a cylindrical object)
3. 02 26 39 -89 43 13 (item like a circle) on

SkyMap there are all three. The second is what we saw. Here are the other two

The difference, compared with Article Examiner, is that I reported il regolo con la misura angolare di riferimento.



Sì, perché come al solito, il trucco per far presa su un certo tipo di pubblico, oltre a citare dichiarazioni o nomi che i creduloni non verificheranno, è sparare cifre che essi non controlleranno...



Nell'articolo si dice che la più grande delle tre astronavi sarebbe lunga 240 km.



Tutte e tre le immagini hanno la stessa scala. Dunque, tanto per cominciare, se la distanza dei tre oggetti fosse la stessa, il più grande dovrebbe essere il secondo, e non il primo.



Ma la cosa più importante è che se non si conosce a priori la dimensione di un oggetto e se non si hanno punti di riferimento, non è possibile determine the distance.

We are looking at a huge distance, a man at an intermediate distance or a Lilliputian next?

In particular, a single astronomical photography is not possible to know the actual size of an unknown object (and in general, without certain guidelines, you can not even be a normal photography). Moreover, if we observe the Sun and the Moon, apparently the same size. During a total eclipse, the moon almost exactly covers the Sun, whose diameter is real but about 400 times bigger. But it is also about 400 times more distant: why the apparent diameters of the two stars are almost identical.

In the images of the alleged spacecraft is shown with a ruler to measure angular reference. From Earth we see the starry sky as a sphere (celestial sphere) of which we occupy the center. Celestial objects appear to be projected onto this sphere, and therefore we can measure its apparent size. It is an angular size. The entire horizon is 360 degrees. Each grade is divided into 60 arcminutes (reads: 60 '). Each arc is first divided into 60 arc seconds (60 is written ").

The average angular diameter of the Sun, for example, is about 32 arcminutes. Its real diameter is 1,392,000 km.

The largest of the three alleged astronomical objects has an angular diameter of plus or minus 1.5 minutes of arc, which is approximately 90 seconds of arc.

With a simple trigonometric formula we can relate angular size (X) in radians , actual size (D) and distance (d):

(1) D = 2 d ∙ ∙ tan (X / 2)
(2) d = ½ ∙ D / tan (X / 2)
(3) X = 2 arctan ∙ (∙ ½ D / d)

For very small angles, tan (X) ≈ X. The relations (1), (2) and (3) can be approximated by:

(1 ') D = d ∙
X (2') d = D / X
(3 ') X = D / d

In our case X is in seconds of arc. At 360 ° there are 1,296,000 seconds that correspond to 2π radians. So X arcsec correspond to X ∙ 2π/1296000 radians, approximately X/206265 radians. Our approximate relations then become:

(1) D = d ∙ X / 206265
(2) d = 206265 ∙ D /
X (3 ") X = 206265 ∙ D / d

Our imaginary spacecraft angular dimension of 90 ".

Let's take the good length of 240 km. In order to calculate the distance we apply (2):

d = 206,265 ∙ 240 / 90 ≈ 550,000 km

According to the article would be aliens to the distance of Pluto, which at the moment is almost five billion miles from Earth. In fact, if the ' astronavona was 240 km long should be a little more distant moon, which is ten thousand times closer than you said. For almost two years to get used would have to travel to frightening speed ... 32 km / h: any of the Sunday cyclist can do better.

If we took the distance for good, perhaps things would be worse by calculating the size. If the ship was part of the pluton, to nearly five billion miles from us, and had 90 "of angular size, then we apply (1):

4.900.000.000 ∙ D = 90 / ; 206,265 2,138,000 ≈

More than two million kilometers in diameter! The ship would be even larger than the Sun (which Pluto is seen by a circle of about one arc-minute). Go to the giant spaceship, but it is frankly a bit 'too much.

summary:

• the alleged astrophysicist at the SETI has never worked and there are traces of a researcher or employee of that name;
• SETI has never made those statements;
• claim to estimate the size of astronomical references without a photo is absurd
• the numbers given in the article are completely unpacked.

So what are the objects on those photos? The answer is quite simple: macerate or soil of another kind when the photographic plates were digitized.

To see this we go to retrieve raw images from which those SkyMap site has been obtained. These are the images of the Second Digitized Sky Survey (DSS ), an atlas of the sky made with ground-based telescopes of the AAO and Palomar observatories, carried out in 1990 on photographic plates and digitized thereafter.

The photographic plates are of glass substrates coated with photosensitive material: as a film, but with the glass instead of plastic.

The plates are then developed and digitized. During this operation is unavoidable that they end up on dirt: dust, macerate, hair, hair, crumbs, bits of paper and every kind junk: even small insects.

Each area of \u200b\u200bthe sky was photographed several times using different optical filters and photographic emulsions (and plates kept at different temperatures), sensitive to wavelengths and thus different colors. The various optical components are then recombined into a single optical image in color.

Let us go then have a look at the site of NASA's SkyView, where you have the raw images I mentioned.

1. click here ;
2. enter the coordinates "16 19 35 -88 43 10" (without quotation marks) in the "Coordinates or source "
3. select " DSS2 Blue "Under" Optical "
4. click on" Submit .

is the result:

This is the raw image in blue. The attack seems a little 'less alien seen so , right? To cut the head of the bull, we look at the images in other colors. These are the red and infrared:

There is no trace of the suspected ship. Not only that, but combining the image in blue in the red with that you get this:

Blue image combined with the red: a star
(arrowed) is hidden by the intruder intruder

The image covers a blue star visible in the red. Even assuming that the object taken in the blue is real, then it should be behind that star (a few thousand light years away) or be transparent. In no case may an alien spacecraft.

Even for items other details you can do this type of control.

conclusion, astrophysicist invented, and invented listing data invented, all against a defect in the digitization of a photographic image passes for alien spacecraft.
PS


Add the coordinates of a couple more of these incredible ASTRON ... avi:

• 16 58 02.16 -84 18 32.1
• 17 12 00:50 -63 17 6.2

---

Insights:

• Giant Spaceships attack to December 2012? (Bad Astronomy)
• of Inbound Internet Rumor Untrue 2012 Spaceships (SETI)